2,002
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 186:
Line 186: − ** And he kind of ruins the last paragraph, by inserting text at the wrong spot. But that just a normal editing mistake that can happen.+ − − +
→Abuse of sysop priviledge
** Calling liberal parties in Europe '''so-called''' ''moderate and center-right''. The is nothing '''so-called''' about heir position. This just shows lack of knowledge of European liberal parties. The worst part about it that there was a lengthy discussion on the talk page. A few editors were struggling to find a good compromise, to characterize the European situation. [[User:RobS]] just shows an enormous amount of disrespect, by disregarding the work by other editors, and the information they provide, to make it more factual.
** Calling liberal parties in Europe '''so-called''' ''moderate and center-right''. The is nothing '''so-called''' about heir position. This just shows lack of knowledge of European liberal parties. The worst part about it that there was a lengthy discussion on the talk page. A few editors were struggling to find a good compromise, to characterize the European situation. [[User:RobS]] just shows an enormous amount of disrespect, by disregarding the work by other editors, and the information they provide, to make it more factual.
** In is next edit he claims that liberals support Saddam. That's simply an opinionated fringe position. Not suitable for an article.
** In is next edit he claims that liberals support Saddam. That's simply an opinionated fringe position. Not suitable for an article.
** In the next edit, he makes his statement even more opinionated, and claims that liberals now reject democracy.
** In the next edit, he makes his statement even more opinionated, and claims that liberal now reject democracy.
** Next few edits he fixes typos.
** Next few edits he fixes typos.
** Then, after his claim that liberal reject foreign policy which advocates human rights and democracy was removed by another editor, he puts it back in with a reference to an article that strongly criticizes Vice-president Cheny. He might have done it for two reasons:
** Then, after his claim that liberals reject foreign policy which advocates human rights and democracy was removed by another editor, he puts it back in with a reference to an article that strongly criticizes Vice-president Cheny. He might have done it for two reasons:
*** First to show that there exist a liberal who rejects the spread of human rights and democracy. But one liberal rejecting it doesn't make it a ''liberal'' position. Worse, the article does not reject such a policy, it rejects the claim by the administration that they did it to advance human rights. He just didn't read the article he quoted. Or worse, because he might have done it for the following reason:
*** First to show that there exist a liberal who rejects the spread of human rights and democracy. But one liberal rejecting it doesn't make it a ''liberal'' position. Worse, the article does not reject such a policy, it rejects the claim by the administration that they did it to advance human rights. He just didn't read the article he quoted. Or worse, because he might have done it for the following reason:
***He just wanted to give an article that is critical on the bush administration free publicity. This would be a case of subtle vandalism.
***He just wanted to give an article that is critical on the bush administration free publicity. This would be a case of subtle vandalism.
** When another editor removes it for good reason, he just puts it back. Without much discussion.
** When another editor removes it for good reason, he just puts it back. Without much discussion.
:Right now there are about 5 editors busy to undo his changes, that [[User:RobS]] just reverts, usually without much discussion. In this way he frustrates a big fraction of the regular contributors. [[User:Order]] 23 March 16:20 (AEST)
:Right now there are about 5 editors busy to undo his changes, that [[User:RobS]] just reverts, usually without much discussion. In this way he frustrates a big fraction of the regular contributors. [[User:Order]] 23 March 16:20 (AEST)