2,002
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 189:
Line 189: − +
→Abuse of sysop priviledge
** Next few edits he fixes typos.
** Next few edits he fixes typos.
** Then, after his claim that liberals reject foreign policy which advocates human rights and democracy was removed by another editor, he puts it back in with a reference to an article that strongly criticizes Vice-president Cheny. He might have done it for two reasons:
** Then, after his claim that liberals reject foreign policy which advocates human rights and democracy was removed by another editor, he puts it back in with a reference to an article that strongly criticizes Vice-president Cheny. He might have done it for two reasons:
*** First to show that there exist a liberal who rejects the spread of human rights and democracy. But one liberal rejecting it doesn't make it a ''liberal'' position. Worse, the article does not reject such a policy, it rejects the claim by the administration that they did it to advance human rights. He just didn't read the article he quoted. Or worse, because he might have done it for the following reason:
*** First to show that there exists a liberal who rejects the spread of human rights and democracy. But one liberal rejecting it doesn't make it a ''liberal'' position. Worse, the article does not reject such a policy, it rejects the claim by the administration that they did it to advance human rights. He just didn't read the article he quoted. Or worse, because he might added the quoye for the following reason:
***He just wanted to give an article that is critical on the bush administration free publicity. This would be a case of subtle vandalism.
***He just wanted to give an article that is critical on the bush administration free publicity. This would be a case of subtle vandalism.
** When another editor removes it for good reason, he just puts it back. Without much discussion.
** When another editor removes it for good reason, he just puts it back. Without much discussion.
:Right now there are about 5 editors busy to undo his changes, that [[User:RobS]] just reverts, usually without much discussion. In this way he frustrates a big fraction of the regular contributors. [[User:Order]] 23 March 16:20 (AEST)
:Right now there are about 5 editors busy to undo his changes, that [[User:RobS]] just reverts, usually without much discussion. In this way he frustrates a big fraction of the regular contributors. [[User:Order]] 23 March 16:20 (AEST)