| Line 41: |
Line 41: |
| | There is no paradox here, and any claim otherwise rests on absurdity. | | There is no paradox here, and any claim otherwise rests on absurdity. |
| | --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 18:25, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | | --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 18:25, 19 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | Let's apply this argument by logical constraint to a few other Christian doctrines, then, shall we? |
| | + | |
| | + | Example 1: |
| | + | ## For a woman to beome pregnant, she must be inseminated. |
| | + | ## Virgins have not been inseminated |
| | + | ## Mary was a virgin |
| | + | ## Therefore, Mary was not pregnant. |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | Example 2: |
| | + | ## Everything that exists has a cause outside of itself. (Premise) |
| | + | ## The universe exists. (Premise) |
| | + | ## Therefore, the universe has a cause outside of itself. |
| | + | ## We call that cause God (cosmological argument). |
| | + | ## God exits (Premise) |
| | + | ## Therefore, God has a cause outside of itself. |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | So - god is too weak to create a squared circle. I get that - but what about the rock? | | So - god is too weak to create a squared circle. I get that - but what about the rock? |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | | | |
| | "Any claim otherwise rests on absurdity"? You seem fairly confident that by using a lot of logical jargon and organizing your post in a way that intimates you know what you're talking about, you can circumvent the inherent logical fallacy that you're assuming you can conceptualize what can exist and what can be created. If you claim to know what can and what cannot be created, such as, for example, a rock that God can't lift, shouldn't that be in the entry for hubris? -mittromney | | "Any claim otherwise rests on absurdity"? You seem fairly confident that by using a lot of logical jargon and organizing your post in a way that intimates you know what you're talking about, you can circumvent the inherent logical fallacy that you're assuming you can conceptualize what can exist and what can be created. If you claim to know what can and what cannot be created, such as, for example, a rock that God can't lift, shouldn't that be in the entry for hubris? -mittromney |