Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 114: Line 114:     
:::::::::: Not so fast, folks.  There is a key insight here that I've just learned from, as have others.  The term "rich" DOES change in meaning over time, and the Greek term could not possibly mean what is meant today by "rich".  Instead, the Greek term means "fully supplied."  Perhaps "idle rich" would be a better translation or, in modern terms, the "complacent" or "lazy miser."--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:03, 26 December 2008 (EST)
 
:::::::::: Not so fast, folks.  There is a key insight here that I've just learned from, as have others.  The term "rich" DOES change in meaning over time, and the Greek term could not possibly mean what is meant today by "rich".  Instead, the Greek term means "fully supplied."  Perhaps "idle rich" would be a better translation or, in modern terms, the "complacent" or "lazy miser."--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:03, 26 December 2008 (EST)
 +
::::::::::::The experts say that it means rich.  Do you know better than the experts?  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] <small>(CPAdmin1)</small><sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 19:11, 26 December 2008 (EST)
    
== Tetragrammata ==
 
== Tetragrammata ==
    
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation "Adonai", used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with "Jehovah" based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the "to be" root of it, opting for "the one who is" or "the eternal". Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)
 
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation "Adonai", used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with "Jehovah" based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the "to be" root of it, opting for "the one who is" or "the eternal". Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)
Siteadmin, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
2,144

edits

Navigation menu