Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 199: Line 199:     
:: "Release" does have that political/legal connotation, but I don't see that as causing a problem in the context.  "Hand over" has a negative connotation, and requires a recipient who does not exist in this context; "give away" implies an inappropriate abandonment of something typically having little value, and that doesn't fit.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:00, 28 December 2008 (EST)
 
:: "Release" does have that political/legal connotation, but I don't see that as causing a problem in the context.  "Hand over" has a negative connotation, and requires a recipient who does not exist in this context; "give away" implies an inappropriate abandonment of something typically having little value, and that doesn't fit.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:00, 28 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
==Question about implementation==
 +
 +
This is a an interesting and worthwhile project - I'm learning a lot from reading about the various interpretations of the terms in question.  What I'm wondering, though, is how to best implement the outcome for others to use.  My first thought would be to choose a "baseline" version of the Bible as a starting point, like the King James Version, then apply the revised translations that are approved and publish this as a "New Conservative Bible" (since calling it the "Conservapedia Bible" would be immodest, I'd think).  This could be done as a searchable electronic copy under a dedicated namespace on the CP site.  The text itself would be protected, of course, but the talk pages would allow for background, commentary and suggestions for other improved translations.  Does this proposal make sense? --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 15:08, 28 December 2008 (EST)
1,516

edits

Navigation menu