Changes

==Question about implementation==

==Question about implementation==

This is a an interesting and worthwhile project - I'm learning a lot from reading about the various interpretations of the terms in question.  What I'm wondering, though, is how to best implement the outcome for others to use.  My first thought would be to choose a "baseline" version of the Bible as a starting point, like the King James Version, then apply the revised translations that are approved and publish this as a "New Conservative Bible" (since calling it the "Conservapedia Bible" would be immodest, I'd think).  This could be done as a searchable electronic copy under a dedicated namespace on the CP site.  The text itself would be protected, of course, but the talk pages would allow for background, commentary and suggestions for other improved translations.  Does this proposal make sense? --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 15:08, 28 December 2008 (EST)

This is an interesting and worthwhile project - I'm learning a lot from reading about the various interpretations of the terms in question.  What I'm wondering, though, is how to best implement the outcome for others to use.  My first thought would be to choose a "baseline" version of the Bible as a starting point, like the King James Version, then apply the revised translations that are approved and publish this as a "New Conservative Bible" (since calling it the "Conservapedia Bible" would be immodest, I'd think).  This could be done as a searchable electronic copy under a dedicated namespace on the CP site.  The text itself would be protected, of course, but the talk pages would allow for background, commentary and suggestions for other improved translations.  Does this proposal make sense? --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 15:08, 28 December 2008 (EST)