Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Bible Retranslation Project (view source)

Revision as of 21:05, December 28, 2008

648 bytes added ,  21:05, December 28, 2008
→‎Question about implementation: reply
Line 205: Line 205:  
::::I think that this project could be a good project if it was done better. Currently, I think this project is overreaching.  I think in order to do proper Bible translating you need to understand Greek/Hebrew and ANE culture at a bare minimum.  I also reasonably believe that in order to do a conservative translating of the Bible you need to understand the Bible exegesis method of Historico-grammatical exegesis which is given here: http://www.godward.org/archives/BS%20Notes/Basic%20rules%20for%20NT%20exegesis.htm  So far, I don't see see aforementioned being done in any great depth.  That is why I don't think the "New Conservative Bible" will catch on.  I think Protestant Christian conservatives will stick with their KJV, NKJV, and NASB Bibles for some time to come. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 15:44, 28 December 2008 (EST)
 
::::I think that this project could be a good project if it was done better. Currently, I think this project is overreaching.  I think in order to do proper Bible translating you need to understand Greek/Hebrew and ANE culture at a bare minimum.  I also reasonably believe that in order to do a conservative translating of the Bible you need to understand the Bible exegesis method of Historico-grammatical exegesis which is given here: http://www.godward.org/archives/BS%20Notes/Basic%20rules%20for%20NT%20exegesis.htm  So far, I don't see see aforementioned being done in any great depth.  That is why I don't think the "New Conservative Bible" will catch on.  I think Protestant Christian conservatives will stick with their KJV, NKJV, and NASB Bibles for some time to come. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 15:44, 28 December 2008 (EST)
 
:::::Conservative, is it 'overreaching' to have a vision? I don't think so. And can man achieve great aims without vision? No. Throughout history, those who have achieved mighty things have been accused of 'overreaching themselves' at the outset. We should have confidence and Hope, and lend support. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 15:53, 28 December 2008 (EST)
 
:::::Conservative, is it 'overreaching' to have a vision? I don't think so. And can man achieve great aims without vision? No. Throughout history, those who have achieved mighty things have been accused of 'overreaching themselves' at the outset. We should have confidence and Hope, and lend support. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 15:53, 28 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::: The efficiency of the learning from this project is far greater than in any other medium, much higher than reading a book, attending a seminar, watching television, discussing with people, etc.  In merely a few spare minutes or hours, the participants in this project have learned more than they could have after spending 10x or 100x many hours in any other medium.  For that reason alone, I feel this project has been more than worthwhile.  As Bugler says, let's see where it goes from here.  What's there to lose?  Nothing, but there is everything to gain in greater [[faith]].--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:05, 28 December 2008 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/595934"

Navigation menu