2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
no edit summary
::I see the same problem with evolution and evolutionists. They like to say that it is in principle subject to disproof, but in practice this seems to not be the case. Sure, certain particular ideas about it are, but that same point applies to creation science. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:31, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::I see the same problem with evolution and evolutionists. They like to say that it is in principle subject to disproof, but in practice this seems to not be the case. Sure, certain particular ideas about it are, but that same point applies to creation science. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:31, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
:::If you want a good treatment of how evolution is falsifiable, and creation "science" is not, please see my talk page, Philip, under the heading "creationism," where an ''actual'' scientist ([[user:PalMD001]]) has discussed the subject. -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 10:14, 23 March 2007 (EDT)