nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + +
What "good" treatment?
:::If you want a good treatment of how evolution is falsifiable, and creation "science" is not, please see my talk page, Philip, under the heading "creationism," where an ''actual'' scientist ([[user:PalMD001]]) has discussed the subject. -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 10:14, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
:::If you want a good treatment of how evolution is falsifiable, and creation "science" is not, please see my talk page, Philip, under the heading "creationism," where an ''actual'' scientist ([[user:PalMD001]]) has discussed the subject. -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 10:14, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::::Okay, I've just had a quick look, and can't find a "good" treatment there at all. But I'll comment further there. By the way, I'm not a scientist, but I do knew quite a few "actual" scientists who are creationists. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:55, 23 March 2007 (EDT)