146
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + +
→Unsourced
This article is completely unsourced and almost reads like an opinion piece. While the beginning I can live with for now being unsourced; the Christian section was making broad psychological and behavioral attributions towards Goths that need to be sourced in a proper encyclopedia. [[User:Lynus|Lynus]] 12:03, 3 January 2009 (EST)
This article is completely unsourced and almost reads like an opinion piece. While the beginning I can live with for now being unsourced; the Christian section was making broad psychological and behavioral attributions towards Goths that need to be sourced in a proper encyclopedia. [[User:Lynus|Lynus]] 12:03, 3 January 2009 (EST)
:If you want to add sourced material, that's probably okay. But this material appears to have been written by a Conservative Christian and as such it must be respected. [[Liberal]] wishful-thinking is not a reasonable justification for removing material. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 22:03, 5 January 2009 (EST)
:If you want to add sourced material, that's probably okay. But this material appears to have been written by a Conservative Christian and as such it must be respected. [[Liberal]] wishful-thinking is not a reasonable justification for removing material. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 22:03, 5 January 2009 (EST)
::If it doesn't cite any sources, it doesn't matter who wrote it. Unless you're in to [[status worship]], that is. No support is given for the claims of "most" this, "most" that throughout the article. The burden of finding evidence is on those who support its conclusion. --[[User:Commodore Guff|KevinS]] 22:06, 5 January 2009 (EST)