Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
345 bytes added ,  21:05, January 6, 2009
Line 93: Line 93:  
# It is not a new property or force but a manifestation of an error of our understanding of an old one, namely gravity.<ref name=Preuss/><ref name=Williams/>
 
# It is not a new property or force but a manifestation of an error of our understanding of an old one, namely gravity.<ref name=Preuss/><ref name=Williams/>
   −
David Cline wrote in ''[[Scientific American]]'' in 2003 the following: "We know little about that sea. The terms we use to describe its components, [[dark matter]] and dark energy, serve mainly as expressions of our ignorance.”<ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes54.html#wp1458731</ref> Similarly, David Shiga authored an article in 2007 published by ''[[New Scientist]]'' titled "Is Dark Energy and Illusion?".<ref>http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn11498-is-dark-energy-an-illusion.html</ref>
+
David Cline wrote in ''[[Scientific American]]'' in 2003 the following: "We know little about that sea. The terms we use to describe its components, [[dark matter]] and dark energy, serve mainly as expressions of our ignorance.”<ref name=Cline>David B. Cline, "The Search for Dark Matter," ''Scientific American'', Vol. 288, March 2003, p. 52.. Cited in Brown, Walt, [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes54.html#wp1458731 Big Bang]?" ''In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood'', 8th ed., 2008.</ref> Similarly, David Shiga authored an article in 2007 published by ''[[New Scientist]]'' titled "Is Dark Energy and Illusion?".<ref name=Shiga>Shiga D, "[http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn11498-is-dark-energy-an-illusion.html Is Dark Energy an Illusion]?" ''New Scientist'', March 30, 2007. Accessed January 6, 2009.</ref>
    
=== Implications of dark energy ===
 
=== Implications of dark energy ===
12,071

edits

Navigation menu