nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 84:
Line 84: + +
→Naturalist Views: No problem.
To do this, we need to make sure that we understand exactly what the naturalist views are. The more we know about their views, the easier it will be to find counter-evidence and counter-arguments. Also, the more clearly that we present the naturalist views, the easier it will be to show visitors to this site the fallacies and other problems with naturalist views.
To do this, we need to make sure that we understand exactly what the naturalist views are. The more we know about their views, the easier it will be to find counter-evidence and counter-arguments. Also, the more clearly that we present the naturalist views, the easier it will be to show visitors to this site the fallacies and other problems with naturalist views.
[[User:WilliamBeason|WilliamBeason]] 10:35, 31 December 2008 (EST)
[[User:WilliamBeason|WilliamBeason]] 10:35, 31 December 2008 (EST)
: I see no problem with that in principle. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:09, 14 January 2009 (EST)
== Claims of "Self-Replicating" Chemicals ==
== Claims of "Self-Replicating" Chemicals ==