| | Just a comment as I pop in, but I think the anti-abstinence arguments being made here are 100%, Grade A stupid. "The husband didn't practice abstinence, so the abstinent wife wasn't 100% protected from HPV." "The mother wasn't abstinent, so her 'abstinent' newborn wasn't 100% protected from HPV." Really? I mean, really? That's the sort of illogic you guys are sticking with? That's like saying, "Well, the first driver was wearing his seatbelt, but the other driver wasn't and he killed the first driver when he was thrown through both windshields. Thus, seat belts don't save lives!" [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:49, 14 January 2009 (EST) | | Just a comment as I pop in, but I think the anti-abstinence arguments being made here are 100%, Grade A stupid. "The husband didn't practice abstinence, so the abstinent wife wasn't 100% protected from HPV." "The mother wasn't abstinent, so her 'abstinent' newborn wasn't 100% protected from HPV." Really? I mean, really? That's the sort of illogic you guys are sticking with? That's like saying, "Well, the first driver was wearing his seatbelt, but the other driver wasn't and he killed the first driver when he was thrown through both windshields. Thus, seat belts don't save lives!" [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:49, 14 January 2009 (EST) |
| | + | : Perhaps you're an abstinence-denier, Jinxmchue. That's someone who won't admit -- and certainly won't teach others -- that abstinence is the cheapest, safest and most effective way to remain free of STDs and to preserve one's fertility. There's no logical denial of this fact, yet you'll see abstinence deniers all over the place, particularly in positions of authority in [[public schools]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:00, 14 January 2009 (EST) |