nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 235:
Line 235: − +
→Template Categories: UPDATE
I don't know. Maybe we (mostly I!) should just get rid of the Navbox category in the normal content pages, and then do something about categorizing templates. I don't think we should bring in TK over this mistake- but I'm sure he can help with the template categorization. So, I think I'll browse through category:navigation box and remove the content pages. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 20:16, 14 January 2009 (EST)
I don't know. Maybe we (mostly I!) should just get rid of the Navbox category in the normal content pages, and then do something about categorizing templates. I don't think we should bring in TK over this mistake- but I'm sure he can help with the template categorization. So, I think I'll browse through category:navigation box and remove the content pages. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 20:16, 14 January 2009 (EST)
*Sorry, too late, Addison! :p ::This was touched on before, I dimly remember. Perhaps it was PJR? Templates and all such would belong to ''Conservapedia Maintenance'', I would think. That would stop extraneous templates, used only for navigation or information ending up in categories having to do with animals, or atomic energy, right? --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:20, 14 January 2009 (EST)
*Sorry, too late, Addison! :p ::This was touched on before, I dimly remember. Perhaps it was PJR? Templates and all such would belong to ''Conservapedia Maintenance'', I would think. That would stop extraneous templates, used only for navigation or information ending up in categories having to do with animals, or atomic energy, right? We need to refrain from removing content pages without some Administrator discussion over it, okay? --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:20, 14 January 2009 (EST)