| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | Unlike Wikipedia, which bills itself as a [[democratic]] system and ends up as a [[mobocracy]], Conservapedia employs a [[Meritocracy|merit system]] and a hierarchy. | | Unlike Wikipedia, which bills itself as a [[democratic]] system and ends up as a [[mobocracy]], Conservapedia employs a [[Meritocracy|merit system]] and a hierarchy. |
| | | | |
| − | Andrew Schlafly is the chief administrator and is the most prolific editor, followed by bureaucrats, [[sysop]]s, and common users. Users who contribute substantial content may be promoted to sysop and bureaucrat, or gain extra user rights such as blocking power and uploading images. | + | Andrew Schlafly is the chief administrator and is the most prolific editor, followed by bureaucrats, [[sysop]]s, and regular editors. Editors who contribute substantial content may be promoted to sysop and bureaucrat, or gain extra user rights such as blocking power and uploading images. |
| | | | |
| | ==Differences with Wikipedia== | | ==Differences with Wikipedia== |
| Line 26: |
Line 26: |
| | | | |
| | *[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] has contributed the majority of content to the extremely popular [[atheism]], [[evolution]], and [[homosexuality]] articles. The first two were articles of the year at Conservapedia, and the evolution article is one of the first results for a search on “evolution” in major search engines.<ref>http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=evolution&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8</ref> | | *[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] has contributed the majority of content to the extremely popular [[atheism]], [[evolution]], and [[homosexuality]] articles. The first two were articles of the year at Conservapedia, and the evolution article is one of the first results for a search on “evolution” in major search engines.<ref>http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=evolution&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | *[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] has contributed a large amount of content about the [[art]]s, such as pages on [[literature]] and [[sculpture]]. His work has helped beautify the encyclopedia. |
| | | | |
| | ==Testimonies and Impact== | | ==Testimonies and Impact== |
| Line 35: |
Line 37: |
| | Search results for controversial subjects such as homsexuality and evolution contain Conservapedia links within a few searches and often on the first page.<ref>http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0geu5abSHtJKrEAHU9XNyoA?p=homosexuality&fr=ush-news</ref> | | Search results for controversial subjects such as homsexuality and evolution contain Conservapedia links within a few searches and often on the first page.<ref>http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0geu5abSHtJKrEAHU9XNyoA?p=homosexuality&fr=ush-news</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | Many biographical articles contain religious references and information about the person’s religion, much more so than Wikipedia. User and college student Tasha Jones, ([[User:Taj|Taj]]) said of this aspect, “It gives me a better understanding of how people feel religion relates to our lives.” <ref>http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jun/19/nation/na-schlafly19</ref> | + | Many biographical articles contain religious references and information about the person’s religion, much more so than Wikipedia. Editor and college student Tasha Jones, ([[User:Taj|Taj]]) said of this aspect, “It gives me a better understanding of how people feel religion relates to our lives.” <ref>http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jun/19/nation/na-schlafly19</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ==See Also== | | ==See Also== |