49
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
no edit summary
I'm going to have at this one as it needs some TLC, help is appreciated.[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] 23:40, 16 August 2007 (EDT)
I'm going to have at this one as it needs some TLC, help is appreciated.[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] 23:40, 16 August 2007 (EDT)
On second thought, this is more of an essay than I cannot salvage into a coherent article.[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] 00:08, 17 August 2007 (EDT)
On second thought, this is more of an essay than I cannot salvage into a coherent article.[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] 00:08, 17 August 2007 (EDT)
:I was just thinking that! It sounds like an English 101 essay, even 1.5 years later. Let's see what can be done.[[User:JParker|JParker]] 23:22, 3 February 2009 (EST)
==Agenda==
==Agenda==
I don't know how a paper is "liberal" or "conservative". Could someone who is a student of journalism, or who just knows about this stuff write a sentence or two about what factors make a paper "liberal" or "conservative?". I know that one clear example would be who the paper supports for president. What other things are included. Thanks!--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:50, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
I don't know how a paper is "liberal" or "conservative". Could someone who is a student of journalism, or who just knows about this stuff write a sentence or two about what factors make a paper "liberal" or "conservative?". I know that one clear example would be who the paper supports for president. What other things are included. Thanks!--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:50, 30 October 2008 (EDT)