49
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + + + + +
→Comics: new section
==Agenda==
==Agenda==
I don't know how a paper is "liberal" or "conservative". Could someone who is a student of journalism, or who just knows about this stuff write a sentence or two about what factors make a paper "liberal" or "conservative?". I know that one clear example would be who the paper supports for president. What other things are included. Thanks!--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:50, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
I don't know how a paper is "liberal" or "conservative". Could someone who is a student of journalism, or who just knows about this stuff write a sentence or two about what factors make a paper "liberal" or "conservative?". I know that one clear example would be who the paper supports for president. What other things are included. Thanks!--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:50, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
== Comics ==
This section makes me chuckle a little. My opinion is that this section lowers the encyclopedia-ness of the article more than the others. And the last part, "...fewer young people will read them." shows who the audience of this article may be. I'm not sure how to reword this paragraph and I don't want to risk getting in trouble by removing the whole thing entirely--what I think should be done.
Somenoe with a better grasp on the English language, help! Thanks [[User:JParker|JParker]] 23:38, 3 February 2009 (EST)