122
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: +
→Controversy: No no no no no, just NO
A number of sources provide reasonable arguments suggesting that the moon landings were a hoax. I think we should include this- we are neutral to the facts, and the facts do often support their claims. Comments? --[[User:DReynolds|DReynolds]] 22:33, 4 February 2009 (EST)
A number of sources provide reasonable arguments suggesting that the moon landings were a hoax. I think we should include this- we are neutral to the facts, and the facts do often support their claims. Comments? --[[User:DReynolds|DReynolds]] 22:33, 4 February 2009 (EST)
:Make a link to a separate article with possible title "Moon landing hoax" and work from there. Make it as detailed as possble, include all arguments made by hoax supporters, as well as arguments refuting them. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:49, 4 February 2009 (EST)
:Make a link to a separate article with possible title "Moon landing hoax" and work from there. Make it as detailed as possble, include all arguments made by hoax supporters, as well as arguments refuting them. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:49, 4 February 2009 (EST)
::The "fake moon landing" controversy has been refuted and debunked MANY times, even going so far as to be debunked on Mythbusters. The controversy has about as much support and logic as the conspiracy that the WTC was an inside job. This is an encyclopedia, we shouldn't give credit to every nutjob conspiracy out there (despite the Obama article). --[[User:ShawnJ|ShawnJ]] 23:08, 4 February 2009 (EST)