Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:World History Lecture One (view source)

Revision as of 00:13, February 6, 2009

495 bytes added ,  00:13, February 6, 2009
replies
Line 114: Line 114:     
:::Andy, what do you think of the 5199 BC date derived from the [[Vulgate]]? That would peg the flood at around 3500 BC. [[User:FundieMath|FundieMath]] 17:21, 5 February 2009 (EST)
 
:::Andy, what do you think of the 5199 BC date derived from the [[Vulgate]]? That would peg the flood at around 3500 BC. [[User:FundieMath|FundieMath]] 17:21, 5 February 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:::: I have an open mind about the dispute over the dates.  I do agree with Philip above that the dates often given for Egyptian achievements seem older than expected.  If the dates for writings or civilizations are pegged to those dubious assumptions about Egypt, then it would throw everything off.
 +
 +
:::: I am surprised to hear that the Vulgate would support a different date (by a thousand years) from other Christian analysis.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:13, 5 February 2009 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,266

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/619894"

Navigation menu