47
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 118:
Line 118: + + + +
Talk:World History Lecture One (view source)
Revision as of 00:40, February 6, 2009
, 00:40, February 6, 2009→More on dates and other problems
:::: I am surprised to hear that the Vulgate would support a different date (by a thousand years) from other Christian analysis.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:13, 5 February 2009 (EST)
:::: I am surprised to hear that the Vulgate would support a different date (by a thousand years) from other Christian analysis.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:13, 5 February 2009 (EST)
:::::I am also surprised by the disparity. It's definitely something I'm going to look into a little more and would enjoy sharing with the community here.
:::::On another note, your objection to the Ussher chronology based on the availability of documents is logical, but I would argue that it is much easier to doubt the secular dates of documents compared to the approximately 1600 year period between creation and flood obtained from an exegesis of Genesis. Although, the general disparity between Septuagint and Vulgate would perhaps speak to the contrary! Nonetheless, fascinating...time to dig a little deeper. [[User:FundieMath|FundieMath]] 19:40, 5 February 2009 (EST)