Changes

:Good question, and your not gonna get a yes or no answer.  We are experiencing once again the same problem.  You see the arguements here, how 650,000 Iraqis have died by violence since 2003.  Ok, so Saddam "kept order" thirty years by randomly sticking a person in a wood chipper every few months, or wiping out somebody's whole family.  This kept the population terrorized and there wasn't the civil strife we see now.  So which is preferable?  30 years of Saddam, or an opportunity to build a free & democratic society?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

:Good question, and your not gonna get a yes or no answer.  We are experiencing once again the same problem.  You see the arguements here, how 650,000 Iraqis have died by violence since 2003.  Ok, so Saddam "kept order" thirty years by randomly sticking a person in a wood chipper every few months, or wiping out somebody's whole family.  This kept the population terrorized and there wasn't the civil strife we see now.  So which is preferable?  30 years of Saddam, or an opportunity to build a free & democratic society?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

:

:You've already answered "yes." And given that you plainly think the mass killing of dissidents is okay when the victims are leftists, what do you mean by a "democratic and free society?" Was Chile "democratic and free" while Pinochet was disappearing people? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 11:08, 24 March 2007 (EDT)