Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 125:
Line 125: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Essay:Draft Conservapedia Application to Become SES Provider (view source)
Revision as of 23:55, February 24, 2009
, 23:55, February 24, 2009a heartfelt thanks
:: I'll edit the content now based on what I read regarding the CCCS. The problem is the CCCS is really specific in some places, yet entirely vague in others.--[[User:Joe B|Joe B]] 18:53, 20 February 2009 (EST)
:: I'll edit the content now based on what I read regarding the CCCS. The problem is the CCCS is really specific in some places, yet entirely vague in others.--[[User:Joe B|Joe B]] 18:53, 20 February 2009 (EST)
== Heartfelt Thanks ==
A heartfelt thanks to all who had suggestions and insights concerning our SES Provider Application, which is complete and will be copied and sent Wednesday.
I would post our entire completed application publicly if there were not so much liberal vandalism on the internet. Maybe in five years there will be less liberal vandalism and more public posting will be possible. With more movement away from liberal ideology and less enabling of moronic and liberal vandalism, that may become possible.
Regardless, a heartfelt thanks again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:55, 24 February 2009 (EST)