Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,253
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 421:
Line 421: + +
→Not liberal
:: Being appalled by his actions is not justification for labelling him in any group. Yes, it is easy for anti-Christians to cite his as a Christian, but them being wrong on that doesn't mean that we can therefore do similar in return and group him with the Democrats simply because we don't want him grouped with us.
:: Being appalled by his actions is not justification for labelling him in any group. Yes, it is easy for anti-Christians to cite his as a Christian, but them being wrong on that doesn't mean that we can therefore do similar in return and group him with the Democrats simply because we don't want him grouped with us.
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:30, 27 February 2009 (EST)
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:30, 27 February 2009 (EST)
:::Perhaps the best solution is not to dwell on how he should be labeled, but to simply acknowledge that his position is not Christian and not worthy of notice. --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:56, 27 February 2009 (EST)