nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 276:
Line 276: + +
→Reversion of "Role" comments
I won't restore these edits since they were reverted by a sysop, but I hope my comments lead to the reversion being reconsidered. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 16:21, 2 March 2009 (EST)
I won't restore these edits since they were reverted by a sysop, but I hope my comments lead to the reversion being reconsidered. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 16:21, 2 March 2009 (EST)
:Oh, and the "context" continues, [http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/03/02/whos-the-boss-of-the-gop-steele-or-limbaugh/ covered] this time by the Christian Science Monitor. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 18:49, 2 March 2009 (EST)
:Oh, and the "context" continues, [http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/03/02/whos-the-boss-of-the-gop-steele-or-limbaugh/ covered] this time by the Christian Science Monitor. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 18:49, 2 March 2009 (EST)
::So, I missed the citations to the actual news stories, the links? Your information included Limbaugh's response, broadcast today on...what..3,000 radio stations? The "Limbaugh bashing" if there was any, was on the part of Michael Steel, who will be lucky to hold on to his job, within the next few weeks. Limbaugh is far more a leader of gravatis than is Steel or Cantor, who took what Libaugh said out-of-context, and as Limbaugh took great time to explain before CPAC, some fifty feet away from where I sat. This out-of-context hooey was also discussed/debated on another page here, right, Dinsdale? --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 19:14, 2 March 2009 (EST)