1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 278:
Line 278: +
→Reversion of "Role" comments
::So, I missed the citations to the actual news stories, the links? Your information included Limbaugh's response, broadcast today on...what..3,000 radio stations? The "Limbaugh bashing" if there was any, was on the part of Michael Steel, who will be lucky to hold on to his job, within the next few weeks. Limbaugh is far more a leader of gravatis than is Steel or Cantor, who took what Libaugh said out-of-context, and as Limbaugh took great time to explain before CPAC, some fifty feet away from where I sat. This out-of-context hooey was also discussed/debated on another page here, right, Dinsdale? --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 19:14, 2 March 2009 (EST)
::So, I missed the citations to the actual news stories, the links? Your information included Limbaugh's response, broadcast today on...what..3,000 radio stations? The "Limbaugh bashing" if there was any, was on the part of Michael Steel, who will be lucky to hold on to his job, within the next few weeks. Limbaugh is far more a leader of gravatis than is Steel or Cantor, who took what Libaugh said out-of-context, and as Limbaugh took great time to explain before CPAC, some fifty feet away from where I sat. This out-of-context hooey was also discussed/debated on another page here, right, Dinsdale? --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 19:14, 2 March 2009 (EST)
:::I can honestly say that I haven't seen this issue raised on another CP page, so if this is redundant it's by coincidence. I saw the Steele comments earlier today while reading the online news on Google (I'm a news junkie, I admit). There's no point in discussing this further if the Steele/Limbaugh conflict is not considered relevant for the Limbaugh page. My parting comment relates to the concept of Limbaugh having gravitas - frankly, the man strikes me as a hypocrite (regarding drug abuse at least) and an opportunist, who's more interested in making millions each year being a conservative demagogue from the safety of a broadcast booth than he is in being part of the solution to serious problems in this country. It was easy for him to take shots at McCain and others last year as being unworthy candidates for conservative values, but if he's got all the answers, then let him run for national public office and walk the walk, not just talk the talk. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 19:56, 2 March 2009 (EST)