nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 87:
Line 87: + + + +
→Broken re-directs: new section
Thanks for the typos correction! In another story, I don't suppose you have block rights for that Badger fellow? He's spouting foolish (albeit interesting) rubbish about a text book being commie propaganda. [[User:ETrundel|ETrundel]] 14:54, 4 March 2009 (EST)
Thanks for the typos correction! In another story, I don't suppose you have block rights for that Badger fellow? He's spouting foolish (albeit interesting) rubbish about a text book being commie propaganda. [[User:ETrundel|ETrundel]] 14:54, 4 March 2009 (EST)
:No problem about the typos, E. As for the Badger, I see the moment is long gone, but for future reference I only have the basic rights that you have.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:10, 5 March 2009 (EST)
:No problem about the typos, E. As for the Badger, I see the moment is long gone, but for future reference I only have the basic rights that you have.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:10, 5 March 2009 (EST)
== Broken re-directs ==
*Many of those are "undiscovered" gems from now blocked users, or belong to users who need to be blocked, and the sub pages should be deleted, I am thinking. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:53, 16 March 2009 (EDT)