9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 345:
Line 345: + +
no edit summary
:I'm guessing that came from a suggestion that I made [[User:Philip J. Rayment/Advice to evolutionists|here]], and if you read that, you might have a better understanding of why it's worded that way. But yes, it was only an off-the-cuff suggestion on my part, and it could be improved. Do you have a suggestion that does justice to what it's trying to say? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:35, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
:I'm guessing that came from a suggestion that I made [[User:Philip J. Rayment/Advice to evolutionists|here]], and if you read that, you might have a better understanding of why it's worded that way. But yes, it was only an off-the-cuff suggestion on my part, and it could be improved. Do you have a suggestion that does justice to what it's trying to say? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:35, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
The view that Neandertals could speak, or at least could speak in the same way modern humans can, is not held by most paleoanthropologists today. Reconstructions of Neandertal supralaryngeal vocal tracts show that they would not have been able to form many of the sounds necessary for human speech<ref>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WKT-4K66DPN-1&_user=4421&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000059598&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=4421&md5=0985af742e620a16039c04e1bd073c24</ref>. I would edit the article myself, but it appears to be locked. [[User:PeterAS|PeterAS]] 23:40, 19 March 2009 (EDT)
== Still trying.... ==
== Still trying.... ==