Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + + +
Talk:Essay:Man is not the descendant of monkey (view source)
Revision as of 16:01, March 20, 2009
, 16:01, March 20, 2009clever, but 100% wrong
::What I find interesting is that it presupposes a worldview that somehow monkeys are "less worthy". Aren't ALL God's creations wondrous? Why must we always want to be considered "better" than all of the rest of Creation, all of which is God's work? There's an implicit arrogance there that reeks of species insecurity, in my book. [[User:KBinbota|KBinbota]] 11:53, 20 March 2009 (EDT)
::What I find interesting is that it presupposes a worldview that somehow monkeys are "less worthy". Aren't ALL God's creations wondrous? Why must we always want to be considered "better" than all of the rest of Creation, all of which is God's work? There's an implicit arrogance there that reeks of species insecurity, in my book. [[User:KBinbota|KBinbota]] 11:53, 20 March 2009 (EDT)
:::You are lowering the value of mankind to the level of a monkey. If people are no more valuable than animals, then they can be killed when they don't do what you want. Ever eat a cheeseburger or swat a mosquito?
:::Why must we always ignore Genesis 1:28 wherein God gave us dominion over all the rest of His creation? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:01, 20 March 2009 (EDT)