nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + + + +
Talk:Essay:Man is not the descendant of monkey (view source)
Revision as of 22:27, March 20, 2009
, 22:27, March 20, 2009The question is whether or not the Bible is correct.
::::Doesn't that seem just a little too convenient? [[User:Kallium|Kallium]] 15:42, 20 March 2009 (EDT)
::::Doesn't that seem just a little too convenient? [[User:Kallium|Kallium]] 15:42, 20 March 2009 (EDT)
::::: "Too convenient"? The Bible explicitly says that man was created in God's image, as Andy said. Man is the only one like this. And as Ed said, man was given dominion over the rest of creation. Man is the "federal head" of creation, so that when man sinned, ''the whole of creation'' (Romans 8:22, NIV) was 'cursed'. And for KBinbota, although it wasn't God's original intention, He specifically told us that we could eat meat (Genesis 9:3). And ants are likely not even considered 'alive' in a biblical sense (as distinct from a modern scientific sense; see [[classification system]]).
::::: So the question is not whether it's "too convenient", but whether the Bible is correct or not.
::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:27, 20 March 2009 (EDT)