Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
579 bytes added ,  20:00, April 2, 2009
improper use of terminology - my pet peeve
Line 6: Line 6:     
::I'm sorry, I don't think I explained myself very well.... I meant the first one added, which is simply an opinion piece from the American Thinker. The first one added is now the second one on the list... I apologise for any confusion '''[[user:JDavidson|<font color="#000085" >JDavidson</font>]]'''[[User_talk:JDavidson|<font color="#660099"><sup>'''Leave a message ::BEEP::'''</sup></font>]] 15:03, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
 
::I'm sorry, I don't think I explained myself very well.... I meant the first one added, which is simply an opinion piece from the American Thinker. The first one added is now the second one on the list... I apologise for any confusion '''[[user:JDavidson|<font color="#000085" >JDavidson</font>]]'''[[User_talk:JDavidson|<font color="#660099"><sup>'''Leave a message ::BEEP::'''</sup></font>]] 15:03, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==The character's name as a term of abuse==
 +
 +
It's odd that people would use this character's name to mean someone a black man who is too submissive, when Uncle Tom actually refused to submit on matters of principle even when his life was at stake. It's as foolish as calling someone a [[Pollyanna]] for indulging in wishful thinking, because the heroine of ''[[Pollyanna]]'' was eminently practical and realistic in her search for the silver lining in the dark clouds that came her way. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:00, 2 April 2009 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu