Changes

::::::::So, it's not censorship, but merely "not exposing the kids to Heather's two mommies"?  How on earth is refusing to even present an idea <b>not</b> censorship?  If conservative positions are really better, shouldn't it be obvious, and thus not require censorship to "protect" people from ideas?  It truly does appear that the Irony Meter has asploded.[[User:JHC|JHC]] 20:20, 19 March 2009 (EDT)

::::::::So, it's not censorship, but merely "not exposing the kids to Heather's two mommies"?  How on earth is refusing to even present an idea <b>not</b> censorship?  If conservative positions are really better, shouldn't it be obvious, and thus not require censorship to "protect" people from ideas?  It truly does appear that the Irony Meter has asploded.[[User:JHC|JHC]] 20:20, 19 March 2009 (EDT)

:::::::::It's whether or not we want the kids exposed to what amounts to the difference between a good idea and a bad idea.  I think kids should be exposed to good ideas only, not bad ones, or bad ones disguised as good ones.  For example, it's not a good idea that you, KrisTree, should come back after a block to create a new sock - JHC - just to rant about what you think is censorship here.  Bad idea.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:28, 19 March 2009 (EDT)

:::::::::It's whether or not we want the kids exposed to what amounts to the difference between a good idea and a bad idea.  I think kids should be exposed to good ideas only, not bad ones, or bad ones disguised as good ones.  For example, it's not a good idea that you, KrisTree, should come back after a block to create a new sock - JHC - just to rant about what you think is censorship here.  Bad idea.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:28, 19 March 2009 (EDT)