Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 49: Line 49:     
::That's my point. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 11:00, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::That's my point. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 11:00, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Right, wasn't it obvious that PF Fox was being ironic?  What I don't understand, either, is how "conservative" can even be a viable category containing both "Christian" and "nationalist," when the United States didn't even exist (nor the modern notion of nationhood, for that matter) in Jesus' day.  Not to mention, of course, that Christianity per se has no stand on nationhood, nor the United States on religion.  But the proof is in the pudding; this category DOES exist, obviously.  It just makes no sense to me. [[User:Tcwing|Tcwing]] 17:26, 7 April 2009 (EDT)Tcwing
3

edits

Navigation menu