13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 81:
Line 81: +
→Irony
::Perhaps there's no citation because there is ''nothing to cite''? Perhaps it's even false? You're asking me to come up with evidence to support a conclusion, when the conclusion typically comes ''after'' the evidence. [[User:Dashing|Dashing]] 21:35, 16 April 2009 (EDT)
::Perhaps there's no citation because there is ''nothing to cite''? Perhaps it's even false? You're asking me to come up with evidence to support a conclusion, when the conclusion typically comes ''after'' the evidence. [[User:Dashing|Dashing]] 21:35, 16 April 2009 (EDT)
:::Why don't you read the news section on the main page, user Dashing...maybe if you open your own eyes you will see news reports and other articles in which the left-wing media is routinly practicing the kind of bigotry that you are denying here. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 21:39, 16 April 2009 (EDT)
:::Why don't you read the news section on the main page, user Dashing...maybe if you open your own eyes you will see news reports and other articles in which the left-wing media is routinly practicing the kind of bigotry that you are denying here. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 21:39, 16 April 2009 (EDT)
::::The news section focus on liberals. Now I know as much as the next guy that all liberals are atheists and elitists, but are they all Muslims and homosexuals? Then they couldn't be atheists and they couldn't breed. The second sentence in this article is "Examples of bigotry include racism and <big>''religious intolerance''</big>", and then it goes right on to make a libelous statement about Muslims. How does that make sense? [[User:Dashing|Dashing]] 21:45, 16 April 2009 (EDT)