Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
231 bytes added ,  01:14, March 26, 2007
no edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:  
:I disagree with your analysis -- my recollection of Heidegger’s Being and Time was that our language traps/tricks us into making assumptions about the nature of being, that the truth of being was never inquired into as we, as language users, already thought we knew what it was.  I would say that fits with my what I’ve said  – but I spent my most recent years stuck in a department which focused far more heavily on the Analytic philosophers than on Continental philosophers, so it is entirely possible that my recollection of their points is mistaken.   
 
:I disagree with your analysis -- my recollection of Heidegger’s Being and Time was that our language traps/tricks us into making assumptions about the nature of being, that the truth of being was never inquired into as we, as language users, already thought we knew what it was.  I would say that fits with my what I’ve said  – but I spent my most recent years stuck in a department which focused far more heavily on the Analytic philosophers than on Continental philosophers, so it is entirely possible that my recollection of their points is mistaken.   
 
:Nonetheless, it is clear that we are in agreement that, whatever the postmodernists did say, what they did not say was truth is a social construct.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:48, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Nonetheless, it is clear that we are in agreement that, whatever the postmodernists did say, what they did not say was truth is a social construct.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:48, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Your description of Heidegger sounds fine, but let's not confuse the issue: you agree he's an existentialist, roughly speaking, not a "postmodernist," right?  (I'm not sure why we're talking about existentialism in this entry...)
5

edits

Navigation menu