Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 106: Line 106:  
::Nit-picking? No. Accurate. We most certainly stress different points: for me, the role of Russia is crucial to the history of Europe, though not beneficial.
 
::Nit-picking? No. Accurate. We most certainly stress different points: for me, the role of Russia is crucial to the history of Europe, though not beneficial.
 
::So, my main point in the discussion above was to show the quite important point that  '''Russia didn't win the Great War'''. That is well-known, and it shouldn't be necessary to invest the energy I had to just to get it accepted at last.
 
::So, my main point in the discussion above was to show the quite important point that  '''Russia didn't win the Great War'''. That is well-known, and it shouldn't be necessary to invest the energy I had to just to get it accepted at last.
 +
::But alas, it is accepted. So I'll turn my attention to other questions. And I will go on to try to correct statements which seem to be wrong to me.
 
::[[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 23:58, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::[[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 23:58, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references />
 
<references />
178

edits

Navigation menu