19
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 54:
Line 54: + +
Debate:Why is there something rather than nothing? (view source)
Revision as of 14:21, April 30, 2009
, 14:21, April 30, 2009no edit summary
::: If we didn't exist, how could we possibly be discussing this? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:29, 20 May 2008 (EDT)
::: If we didn't exist, how could we possibly be discussing this? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:29, 20 May 2008 (EDT)
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
By addressing the state of "nothing" we are causing something so there will always be something rather than nothing. In the same way one can try to "clear your head" but this fails because in the act of clearing one's head one is filling it with the task of clearing the head/the mind. In this way we must always have something rather than nothing. Even in a vaccuum, the absence of everything is something. [[Bealecr]] 15:21, 30 April 2009