28
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36:
Line 36: + +
Debate:Why is there something rather than nothing? (view source)
Revision as of 23:34, September 30, 2009
, 23:34, September 30, 2009no edit summary
The relationship between something and nothing is the same as the relationship between life and death, but not because one's purpose is to create the other. Rather, it's because the latter is the absence of the former. It is not the purpose of death or nothing to create life (that's impossible) and it's not the purpose of life or something to create death or nothing. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:43, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
The relationship between something and nothing is the same as the relationship between life and death, but not because one's purpose is to create the other. Rather, it's because the latter is the absence of the former. It is not the purpose of death or nothing to create life (that's impossible) and it's not the purpose of life or something to create death or nothing. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:43, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
If there was nothing, we simply wouldn't be here to observe it. -- [[LincolnShuddered|LincolnShuddered]] 18:34, 30 September 2009
==Why Not?==
==Why Not?==