11
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 496:
Line 496: + + +
→c***
Hmmm, first of all, [[Conservapedia]] contains virtually no profanity or references of liberal rants at all. It was my thought that the disgusting behavior of Perez Hilton should be exposed, but now that you mention it I'm not sure it fits with site policy. But I'll leave it for now and please do not revert my edit. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 23:47, 1 May 2009 (EDT)
Hmmm, first of all, [[Conservapedia]] contains virtually no profanity or references of liberal rants at all. It was my thought that the disgusting behavior of Perez Hilton should be exposed, but now that you mention it I'm not sure it fits with site policy. But I'll leave it for now and please do not revert my edit. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 23:47, 1 May 2009 (EDT)
The point was that he rescinded his apology, not that he is profane (we already knew this). At what point does it become too profane to even quote? For a Christian encyclopedia, I think it already crossed the line. Perez Hilton being profane has absolutely nothing to do with him being a bigot. If you think it does, please explain. - Allison