Changes

Alluding to this is completely unnecessary. I don't want my children reading this encyclopedia if it directly references every profane rant from a liberal. - Allison

Alluding to this is completely unnecessary. I don't want my children reading this encyclopedia if it directly references every profane rant from a liberal. - Allison

Hmmm, first of all, [[Conservapedia]] contains virtually no profanity or references of liberal rants at all. It was my thought that the disgusting behavior of Perez Hilton should be exposed, but now that you mention it I'm not sure it fits with site policy. But I'll leave it for now and please do not revert my edit. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 23:47, 1 May 2009 (EDT)

:Hmmm, first of all, [[Conservapedia]] contains virtually no profanity or references of liberal rants at all. It was my thought that the disgusting behavior of Perez Hilton should be exposed, but now that you mention it I'm not sure it fits with site policy. But I'll leave it for now and please do not revert my edit. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 23:47, 1 May 2009 (EDT)

The point was that he rescinded his apology, not that he is profane (we already knew this). At what point does it become too profane to even quote? For a Christian encyclopedia, I think it already crossed the line. Perez Hilton being profane has absolutely nothing to do with him being a bigot. If you think it does, please explain. - Allison

:::I don't want to make an argument, but since the quote is merely an allusion and the letters censored, I don't see how can be offensive to a reader.

 

:::Since he would make this allusion while claiming to be apologizing ''does'' show bigotry and reveal his character. It's not because it's profanity that I want to include it, of course, but because it is an insight into how bigoted the guy is, that he cannot even make a real apology after going on a rant against Prejean. So yes, I do think his bigotry is revealed by his profanity. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 23:55, 1 May 2009 (EDT)