1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
Creation vs. evolution debate (view source)
Revision as of 19:12, May 17, 2009
, 19:12, May 17, 2009→The debate
In the United States, various court decisions have concluded that religious views of creation cannot be taught in schools, and a recent court decision concluded that Intelligent Design proponents have a religious motive, and therefore barred the introduction of intelligent design into public science curricula.
In the United States, various court decisions have concluded that religious views of creation cannot be taught in schools, and a recent court decision concluded that Intelligent Design proponents have a religious motive, and therefore barred the introduction of intelligent design into public science curricula.
However, the court failed to consider whether or not proponents of evolution have a religious motive.
However, the court failed to consider whether or not proponents of evolution have a religious motive.
Evolution does hold ground in the observations we can all make around us. One example of micro-evolution occuring everyday is the mutation of bacteria. Following the principle of Occam's razor, evolution is the most logical conclusion, as compared to a god or deity controlling every mutation occuring every day.
== History of the creation vs. evolution debate ==
== History of the creation vs. evolution debate ==