1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42:
Line 42: + + + + + + +
→Really liberalism?: new section
We need to write a lot more about the pro-Communist whitewash. The lefties cannot suppress the book, but they seem to have been able to explain it away. How about an article on the [[Potemkin Village]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:29, 6 January 2009 (EST)
We need to write a lot more about the pro-Communist whitewash. The lefties cannot suppress the book, but they seem to have been able to explain it away. How about an article on the [[Potemkin Village]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:29, 6 January 2009 (EST)
== Really liberalism? ==
Are you sure? I was under the impression that the whole point of Ingsoc and the Party was that it transcended liberalism and conservatism, even if it is called "English Socialism." The point was that it had become the ''Perfect Government,'' in that it has no flaws, and can maintain power indefinitely, so long as it remains in a constant state of war, which it will. It has none of the disadvantages associated with either liberalism or conservatism, or even socialism, for that matter. In truth, it is solely fascist totalitarian.
In Jesus's Almighty Name we pray, may His will be done,--[[User:Thunderhorse|Thunderhorse]] 11:26, 21 May 2009 (EDT)