Changes

You're trashing relativity and field theory too. Why? In my last post I listed several Nobel-awarded experimental proofs of the success of field theory: all theoretical predictions made with local Hamiltonians; action at a distance is not needed. You ignored them. So if those are irrelevant, then what IS your point?

You're trashing relativity and field theory too. Why? In my last post I listed several Nobel-awarded experimental proofs of the success of field theory: all theoretical predictions made with local Hamiltonians; action at a distance is not needed. You ignored them. So if those are irrelevant, then what IS your point?

Write 3 sentences. Top 3 evidences that action at a distance is the only way for particles to interact. Oh God you're right, my mind is so closed. "For my own sake", please open my weak mind with THREE EVIDENCES!  Or if I've got your point wrong, what IS your point then?? [[User:Cuddlytakun|Cuddlytakun]] 16:10, 21 May 2009 (EDT)

Write 3 sentences. Top 3 evidences that action at a distance is the only way for particles to interact. Oh God you're right, my mind is so closed. "For my own sake", please open my weak mind with THREE EVIDENCES!  Or if I've got your point wrong, what IS your point then??  

 

PS: "your perception of what you think" is a redundant phrase. Andy, your "word-to-substance ratio" is very high; you are likely a [[liberal]].  [[User:Cuddlytakun|Cuddlytakun]] 16:10, 21 May 2009 (EDT)

== Proof ==

== Proof ==