Changes

Is your point "All evidence is against your view"? OK, dish it out. Just list the top 3 evidences showing that action at a distance is the only way possible for particles to interact.

Is your point "All evidence is against your view"? OK, dish it out. Just list the top 3 evidences showing that action at a distance is the only way possible for particles to interact.

My point is: the horrible paragraph in the Intro about non-locality and field theory, incorrectly implies field theory is defective. It is not. Field theory is the most successful theory in the history of science.  Weinberg's statement about field theory not being "robust" cannot be assessed by the reader because "robust" is not defined in this context. Weinberg's speech was written in '79, his criticisms were resolved by later successes of QCD and QED, as Wilczek described.

My point is: the horrible paragraph in the Intro about non-locality and field theory, incorrectly implies field theory is defective. It is not. Field theory is the most successful theory in the history of science.  Weinberg's statement about field theory not being "robust" cannot be assessed by the reader because "robust" is not defined in this context. Weinberg's speech was written in '79, his criticisms were resolved by later successes of QCD and QED, as Wilczek described. That paragraph should go.

You're trashing relativity and field theory too. Why? In my last post I listed several Nobel-awarded experimental proofs of the success of field theory: all theoretical predictions made with local Hamiltonians; action at a distance is not needed. You ignored them. So if those are irrelevant, then what IS your point?

You're trashing relativity and field theory too. Why? In my last post I listed several Nobel-awarded experimental proofs of the success of field theory: all theoretical predictions made with local Hamiltonians; action at a distance is not needed. You ignored them. So if those are irrelevant, then what IS your point?

Write 3 sentences. Top 3 evidences that action at a distance is the only way for particles to interact. Oh God you're right, my mind is so closed. "For my own sake", please open my weak mind with THREE EVIDENCES!  Or if I've got your point wrong, what IS your point then??  

Write 3 sentences. Top 3 evidences that action at a distance is the only way for particles to interact. Oh God you're right, my mind is so closed. "For my own sake", please open my weak mind with THREE EVIDENCES!  Or if I've got your point wrong, what IS your point then??  

PS: "your perception of what you think" is a redundant phrase. Andy, your "word-to-substance ratio" is very high; you are likely a [[liberal]].  [[User:Cuddlytakun|Cuddlytakun]] 16:10, 21 May 2009 (EDT)

PS: "your perception of what you think" is a redundant phrase. Andy, your "word-to-substance ratio" is very high; you are likely a [[liberal]].  --[[User:Cuddlytakun|Cuddlytakun]] 16:10, 21 May 2009 (EDT)

== Proof ==

== Proof ==