Changes

::I just put in more of the speech. She is making the conservative argument that there are differences between men and women. She said, ''"Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences, a possibility I abhor less or discount less than my colleague Judge Cedarbaum, our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging."'' Now liberals may call that racism but we're not liberals here and so we don't call it that. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:24, 28 May 2009 (EDT)

::I just put in more of the speech. She is making the conservative argument that there are differences between men and women. She said, ''"Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences, a possibility I abhor less or discount less than my colleague Judge Cedarbaum, our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging."'' Now liberals may call that racism but we're not liberals here and so we don't call it that. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:24, 28 May 2009 (EDT)

:::Maybe you are right but I am not convinced. 'White' male & 'Latina' women is an argument categorized by race and gender. While the other way around would be considered racist by liberals, at the very least it is reverse racism and she shouldn't get a pass. I will leave in place how you corrected.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:28, 28 May 2009 (EDT)

:::Maybe you are right but I am not convinced. 'White' male & 'Latina' women is an argument categorized by race and gender. While the other way around would be considered racist by liberals, at the very least it is reverse racism and she shouldn't get a pass. I will leave in place how you corrected.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:28, 28 May 2009 (EDT)