17,394
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 40:
Line 40: + + + +
→Sources?: new section
:::Maybe you are right but I am not convinced. 'White' male & 'Latina' women is an argument categorized by race and gender. While the other way around would be considered racist by liberals, at the very least it is reverse racism and she shouldn't get a pass. I will leave in place how you corrected.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:28, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
:::Maybe you are right but I am not convinced. 'White' male & 'Latina' women is an argument categorized by race and gender. While the other way around would be considered racist by liberals, at the very least it is reverse racism and she shouldn't get a pass. I will leave in place how you corrected.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:28, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
::::agreed. As Gingrich said, her argument would be considered racist by liberals and so they're hypocrites to ignore it. But we're conservatives and we agree with Sotomayor.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:32, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
::::agreed. As Gingrich said, her argument would be considered racist by liberals and so they're hypocrites to ignore it. But we're conservatives and we agree with Sotomayor.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:32, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
== Sources? ==
Her brother was introduced by Obama as a physician in Syracuse. Her Princeton record is pretty clear. see [http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S24/33/44Q39/index.xml?section=topstories Princeton Press release] [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 05:22, 30 May 2009 (EDT)