Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 92:
Line 92: + +
Talk:Arguments for the existence of God (view source)
Revision as of 23:33, June 14, 2009
, 23:33, June 14, 2009→Cosmological Arguments: reply
The problem with cosmological arguments seems to me that one can assume the universe is eternally, and doens't require a cause. [[User:Ckikilwai|Ckikilwai]] 18:58, 14 June 2009 (EDT)
The problem with cosmological arguments seems to me that one can assume the universe is eternally, and doens't require a cause. [[User:Ckikilwai|Ckikilwai]] 18:58, 14 June 2009 (EDT)
: One can "assume" whatever he likes; but not all assumptions are true. The assumption that the universe existed eternally is utterly false. Not even atheistic scientists believe in that assumption.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:33, 14 June 2009 (EDT)