Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
362 bytes added ,  02:07, March 27, 2007
→‎Petrus' and my edits: There's that "literalism" furphy again.
Line 72: Line 72:     
:Yes, yes. Wonderful wriggle! My edit referred to the literal meaning of the words - which I thought people like you were rather keen on - rather than their over-all interpretation. I have now made that clear. (What you mean, of course, is that you don't like the implications of what the text actually says: I can't say I blame you.) --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 12:21, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Yes, yes. Wonderful wriggle! My edit referred to the literal meaning of the words - which I thought people like you were rather keen on - rather than their over-all interpretation. I have now made that clear. (What you mean, of course, is that you don't like the implications of what the text actually says: I can't say I blame you.) --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 12:21, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::You thought wrong (as I find so often with anti-creationists; they frequently have little idea of the view that they so readily disparage).  Creationists are "keen on" what the author meant.  The author did not always mean things to be taken literally (think metaphors, parables, etc.). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:07, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu