12
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
Talk:Seventh-day Adventist Church (view source)
Revision as of 22:56, July 10, 2009
, 22:56, July 10, 2009suggested alternate wording?
::What you did was to minimized the substantial conflict that SDA had and has with historical Christianity, as well as to sanitize the negative things which it revolve around, while favorably presenting your doctrine. Your censoring would not even be allowed on WP.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 17:44, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
::What you did was to minimized the substantial conflict that SDA had and has with historical Christianity, as well as to sanitize the negative things which it revolve around, while favorably presenting your doctrine. Your censoring would not even be allowed on WP.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 17:44, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
::CP is not the venue for bitter theological disputes--and especially not for arguments that the Ten Commandments no longer apply. (for the record, my background is Roman Catholic) [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 18:14, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
::CP is not the venue for bitter theological disputes--and especially not for arguments that the Ten Commandments no longer apply. (for the record, my background is Roman Catholic) [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 18:14, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
I notice I cannot edit this article, so I thought 'd just post this here - the sentence "This was later moved to 1844, but which also failed." is not very clear. Perhaps "This was later changed to 1844, but his (the?) prophecy failed to come to pass", or somesuch wording might be a little clearer? --[[User:KipDonner|KipDonner]] 18:56, 10 July 2009 (EDT)