17,394
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 572:
Line 572: − − ==SDA infomercial== − − What is your justification for completely eliminating the history of the conflict between Evangelical faith and the [[Seventh-day Adventist Church]], and sanitizing it of any balance for the infomercial that it blatantly was before, and stood untouched for months as, and now is an expanded version of? Must readers go to WP to obtain a more comprehensive view of SDA and its history?[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 19:46, 10 July 2009 (EDT) − ::1) it's not very important and 2) it was poorly handled. This is now an article based on modern scholarship, not old polemics. The language in use here is unacceptable: ''sanitizing, blatant, infomercial''. Please never use such language again. thanks. A little Christian charity would also be useful. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 20:41, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
no edit summary
Are you the same R. J. Jensen that studied the fallacy of the NINA signs!?!? If you are I admire your work!!--[[User:IScott|IScott]] 09:57, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
Are you the same R. J. Jensen that studied the fallacy of the NINA signs!?!? If you are I admire your work!!--[[User:IScott|IScott]] 09:57, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
::thanks--that's me. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 13:40, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
::thanks--that's me. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 13:40, 10 July 2009 (EDT)