Automoderated users, edit
3,552
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 122:
Line 122: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Updating a link
Andy, thank you for unlocking the page - I fixed the broken link, so if you'd like to re-lock, it should be fine now. I'm going to go ahead and check all the other links on the page, and if they're not working, find replacements. If I find anything, I'll post here. [[User:JDBowen|JDBowen]] 17:20, 11 July 2009 (EDT)
Andy, thank you for unlocking the page - I fixed the broken link, so if you'd like to re-lock, it should be fine now. I'm going to go ahead and check all the other links on the page, and if they're not working, find replacements. If I find anything, I'll post here. [[User:JDBowen|JDBowen]] 17:20, 11 July 2009 (EDT)
:Whew, there are quite a few, actually!
:The first link in (5) doesn't seem to be working for me, but it might just be me. This link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2104131/posts would provide a reference for the same statement.
:Link (9) is broken, the page no longer exists. This link: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article6051268.ece would provide a reference for the same statement.
:Link (12) is broken, the page no longer exists. This link: http://news.chennaionline.com/newsitem.aspx?NEWSID=9fab8324-a1a1-4ad6-840f-76b04a405a65&CATEGORYNAME=INTER would provie a reference for the same statement.
:Reference (19) has the same link listed twice. Nothing wrong with that, but it seems kind of sloppy to me.
:Link (23) is broken, the page no longer exists. This is my fault, since I just added it, but (22) is just fine as a single reference. So we can eliminate this broken link without replacement, especially for a statement that returns as many google hits as this one does.
:I'll keep going, but I wanted to post this stuff up now, so my screen doesn't get cluttered with tabs and such. [[User:JDBowen|JDBowen]] 17:33, 11 July 2009 (EDT)